**TOWN OF GRAND ISLAND**

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

      FINAL

MINUTES

January 7, 2010

 

 

 

MEMBERS PRESENT:            Marion Fabiano, Betty Harris, Dario Violanti, Peter McKee, Chairman, Bob Mesmer and Alternate member, Tim Phillips

 

MEMBERS ABSENT:                  None

 

OTHERS PRESENT:               Dan Linenfelser, Bill Shaw, Zoning Officers

 

Chairman, Peter McKee opened the meeting at 7:00 p.m. He introduced the members of the Zoning Board of Appeals and explained the process.  Copies of the Legal Notice of Appeal to be heard at this meeting published in the Island Dispatch on December 24, 2009 were available to those present.

                                                                                                                                   

           

NEW BUSINESS:

 

1) 1925 Stony Point Road – Tom Victor

The property is zoned R1B, the Appellant appeared and stated that he is in the process of building a new home with 3 attached garage spaces and is requesting a variance for the construction of a 30’ x 60’ pole barn.  The Appellant needs additional storage for cars, trucks, tractors and the like.  The pole barn will be located more than 100’ behind the house, there are no utilities currently planned and there will be no commercial use. 

 

Per Section 49-36A of the Zoning Code, the maximum allowable number of garage spaces is four, there currently exists three, and they are requesting an additional six garage spaces, for a total of nine, which requires a variance for five additional garage spaces.

 

A motion was made by Fabiano/Mesmer to GRANT a variance for the construction of a 30’ x 60’ pole barn which would result in five additional garage spaces at 1925 Stony Point Road.

 

Roll Call:

            Ayes:  Fabiano, Violanti, Harris, Mesmer and McKee

            Noes:  None

            Carried

           

 

Rationale:  This action is taken because:

 

1.       the requested variance will not create a detriment to nearby properties.

2.       the board recognizes the need for more vehicle storage.

3.       of the size of the lot.

 

Page 2

01/07/10

 

2) 2735 Bedell Road- Daniel Drexelius

The property is zoned M2, the Appellant appeared and stated that he was informed by the Town that he needed a variance for a side yard setback for the temporary work site storage containers he has had on his property for five years.  According to Schedule 1 of the Zoning Code, the minimum allowable setback in M2 zoning is 25’, the containers are located 10’ from the property line, and therefore the applicant is requesting a 15’ side yard setback variance. 

 

The Appellant stated that the Planning Board previously approved the project with a probable ten year timeline.  These temporary storage building will be removed after completion of all the phases of the project.  There are no foundations, and the containers have 2’ x 4’ beams along the ceiling, they do have blacktop underneath. 

 

The property is zoned for outside storage; however, the Appellant has decided to use temporary storage containers so the site would be aesthetically pleasing.  He is planning on completing one building per year at the cost of $100,000 per building.

 

The issue at hand is how long can the temporary containers remain before they are considered permanent.  And if they are considered to be permanent they would have to go through the permitting process.

 

The Appellant submitted a letter of support from his neighbor who is located directly across the street from 2735 Bedell Rd., Mr. Michael Hooper.

 

Chairman McKee stated that the storage containers located at 2735 Bedell Road would not normally be considered temporary.  However, due to the nature of the project, they may be determined to be temporary with a maximum timeline.

 

Speaker in favor:

Tom Snyder, 2671 Bedell Road

 

A motion was made by Fabiano/Violanti to DENY the request for a 15’ side yard setback variance at 2735 Bedell Road.

 

Roll Call:

            Ayes:  Fabiano, Violanti, Harris, Mesmer and McKee

            Noes:  None

            Carried

           

 

Rationale:  This action is taken because:

 

4.       the ‘interpretation’ by the Zoning Board of Appeals members is that the storage containers are considered to be “temporary”, therefore, granting a variance is not required.  However, if the Zoning Board had ‘interpreted’ the storage containers to be permanent structures, then a variance would be necessary to maintain the structures in their current location.

 

Page 3

01/07/10

 

 

A motion was made by Violanti/Harris to CONTINUE to consider the existing storage containers as “temporary” storage containers provided that there are no additional containers added to the site.  The storage containers are to be removed within six years at the end of which, the project should be completed, and the temporary storage containers are to be removed and no new containers will be constructed.  The containers shall be removed no later than January 1, 2016.  If the property is sold, the containers located on the property shall not be considered to be grandfathered, and therefore, must be removed from the site at 2735 Bedell Road.

 

Roll Call:

            Ayes:  Fabiano, Violanti, Harris, McKee, and Mesmer

            Noes:  None

            Carried

 

 

 

Rationale:  This action is taken because:

 

1.  the temporary storage containers will not create a detriment to nearby properties.

2.  of the unusual nature of the project.

3.  the Planning Board of Grand Island had previously defined the buildings as temporary storage containers.

4.  the Zoning Department will follow up on the timely removal of the temporary storage containers.

 

 

 

3)  2878 East River Road – David M. Bruno

The property is zoned R1C, the Appellant appeared and stated that he has four antique cars which require additional storage, therefore, he is proposing to build a 30’ x 36.5’ detached 3.5 car garage.  Per Section 49-36 A, the maximum allowable number of garage spaces is four; there already exists 2, therefore, the Appellant is requesting a variance for 1.5 additional garage spaces.  There will be no commercial use.

 

Also, the Appellant is proposing to construct a stairway, deck, dock and pergola on the waterside of the property.  The waterside portion of the property drops off significantly and is virtually unusable without a stairway. Per Section 49-27A of the Zoning code, the minimum allowable front yard setback is 90’ from the center line, therefore a 42’ front yard setback variance would be required.  Also, per Section 49-27C of the Zoning Code, the maximum height of an accessory structure on riverfront lots is 4’, the proposed pergola is 8’ 6” high; therefore, a 4’ 6” height variance is required. The top of the pergola will be below the grade of the road. 

 

 

Page 4

01/07/10

 

A motion was made by Fabiano/Mesmer to GRANT an additional garage space variance, not to exceed two garage spaces for the construction of a garage at  2878 East River Road.  There is to be no commercial use.

 

 

Roll Call:

            Ayes:  Fabiano, Violanti, Harris, McKee, and Mesmer

            Noes:  None

            Carried

 

Rationale:  This action is taken because:

 

1.  the board recognizes the need for additional storage.

2.  the requested variance will not create a detriment to nearby properties.

 

 

A motion was made by Mesmer/Harris to GRANT a 42’ front yard setback variance for the construction of a stairs, dock, deck and pergola on the water side of the property at 2878 East River Road. 

 

 

Roll Call:

            Ayes:  Fabiano, Violanti, Harris, McKee, and Mesmer

            Noes:  None

            Carried

 

Rationale:  This action is taken because:

 

1.  most riverside lots require a side yard setback.
2.  of the unique situation due to the contour of the lot.

3.  it is consistent with variances granted for nearby properties

 

 

A motion was made by Violanti/Fabiano to GRANT a 4’ 6” height variance for the construction of an 8’ 6” pergola on the waterside of the property at 2878 East River Road.

 

 

Roll Call:

            Ayes:  Fabiano, Violanti, Harris, McKee, and Mesmer

            Noes:  None

            Carried

 

 

Rationale:  This action is taken because:

 

1.  the requested variance will not create a detriment to nearby properties.

2.  the additional 4’ height sits below the road level.

3.  of the unique situation due to the contour of the lot.

4.  consistent with variances granted for nearby properties.

Page 5

01/07/10

OLD BUSINESS:

 

1) West River Road – Nixon Peabody LLP – Proposed telecommunication tower on Russell & Patricia Colosi’s property on West River Road.  Zoning Code 49-196C states that the setback for a telecommunication tower is 500’ from a residential dwelling.  The proposed tower will be approximately 442’ from the Colosi residence; therefore a 58’ setback variance is requested.  Remains tabled pending receipt of the SEQR report from the Town Board.

 

2) 2770 Long Road – Verizon Wireless – Property is zoned M1. Proposed is a telecommunication facility.  Per Zoning Code Section 49-196C, there should be a 500’ setback for the fall down area.  Tem remains tabled pending receipt of the SEQR report from the Town Board.

 

3) 2255 Grand Island Boulevard – Michael Jordan of Redtek Development  - Property is zoned R3, B1, and R1D.  Proposed is the construction of a Senior Housing Complex with building walls greater than 160’ in length.  Per Schedule 1 of the Zoning Code, the maximum allowable building length is 160’.  The item was tabled indefinitely at the owner’s request.

 

4) 2065 East River Road – Roger and Shirley Nye-

The Appellant’s attorney emailed a proposed settlement agreement to the Zoning Board of Appeals members for their review.  The Board members reviewed the proposed settlement and discussed same.  At the December 3rd 2009 ZBA meeting, after careful review, the Board unanimously decided to DENY the proposed settlement request.  The rationale was that the variance granted was for an open porch which has been previously defined as one which has three (3) open sides.  

 

 

MINUTES:

 

A motion made by Fabiano/Violanti to ACCEPT the December 3, 2009 minutes as written.

 

Roll Call:

            Ayes: Harris, Fabiano, Violanti, McKee, and Mesmer

            Noes:  None

            Carried

 

 

OTHER MINUTES RECEIVED AND FILED:

 

Board of Architectural Review Minutes, October 20, 2009, November 17, 2009

Planning Board Agenda, December 14,, 2009

Planning Board Minutes, November 9, 2009

Town Board Agenda, December 7, 2009, December 21, 2009

Town Board Minutes, November 2, 2009, November 16, 2009

 

Adjournment: 8:00 p.m. on January 7, 2010

Jacqueline McGinty, Recording Secretary prepared the minutes.